In this
document we will briefly explain how to make a philosophical dissertation. The
dissertation is the writing or speech that talks, understanding lecture as the
action of exposing an own opinion founded and reasoned about a particular
topic.
It is important
to understand what is and what is not a dissertation. We have said that it is
the exposure of an own opinion so you must define what is an opinion. Express
an opinion, in the context of the dissertation, it is radically different to
express a view, apparently not melts and does not pretend to any objectivity,
is not supported by an argumentation, is simple expression of a feeling or
subjective idea. For example the sentence "I like your green dress, it's
very nice" is an opinion and not an opinion, at least in the context of a
dissertation, since it does not have and does not seek to be informed; views
are also "I think that Plato is right" or "this idea of
Nietzsche is very real" that if these phrases do not go beyond expressing
a judgement without basis are not building any opinion.
In the
definition of lecture we said that it was a personal opinion founded and
reasoned about a particular topic. That opinion is itself is important, if we
confine ourselves to expose the trial that Nietzsche or Aristotle have on the
philosophy of Socrates are not articulating a dissertation but a simple
statement of opinions of others; either cite the opinion of Professor is
lecture. The opinion means cited authors, readings, films or news that melt
your opinion and whose proposals sit nearby, you can also cite sources to
criticize them in your dissertation but typically cite them so that you support
because you are looking for is that position that these expressing is
reinforced in your argumentation. It is important that the Foundation is not
too pedantic, i.e. not he cites dozens of sources only mention without almost
come to mind, that much astral the intelligibility of the dissertation and it
just seems that you are not expressing a personal opinion but a pastiche of
opinions of others.
The foundation
of the opinion is relevant but not as much as the argument, this is the most
important element in the dissertation. Argue is to give the reasons why you
have this or that opinion on the subject on which you diastase. Rules of
argumentation are explicit ed in many manuals and notes, but for not much
further, we can say that the argumentation rules are of course known by all in
how much rational beings rules: draw conclusions, to establish Parallels, etc.
When faced with an issue on which lecture you should ask yourself what my
opinion on this matter? and once reflections and have clear your opinion you
should ask yourself why you think what I think? the answer to this second
question is the argument of the dissertation.
When you oblige
to speak on a given topic can essentially have two points of view: one critic
with the stated topic and another favorable. It is usual instead of extreme
positions have intermediate reviews, intermediate positions allow a greater
clarification in the dissertation. To argue over opinions of others you need to
be able to analyses the arguments for and against but then you leaning for one
of two positions, this will show a depth of greater than criterion if you only
attack posture without weighing its pros or if you just dedicate yourself to
say that they agree with everything without analyzing the critical elements
with this view that you are favorable write my paper.
Vital it is
that although analysis pros and cons you not contradicts and Clara have your
opinion on the subject. If you start a dissertation thinking "Is
good", and just holding that "A is bad" your dissertation is
contradicted, there is no greater error in an argument that a contradiction.
We've talked
about the parts of a dissertation but keep in mind that performing the
construction is more dynamic and the reasoning and argumentation mingle quite
frequently. It is correct to do so so that the text that you book is dynamic
and reaches the reader. If the dissertation is located within a review or
comment text must not forget separate it from the rest of the test with
expressions such as "believe that", "in my opinion",
"consider that"... so that the content objectives of the test are not
confused with your opinions, that confusion can become fatal.
No comments:
Post a Comment